Friday, November 30, 2007

Who Is The Customer?

I was asked this question on a recent blog posting, and needed to give it some thought before giving my answer. For those interested, here it is, from my perspective. Let’s start with answering that question in the reality of our world from a business perspective. Who is the customer? There are many different levels of ‘customer.’ To the manufacturers of the product (let’s stick with toothpaste as the product, as per last week’s blog), WalMart itself is the customer. Aquafresh markets to WalMart, not to the end user. For WalMart, the customer is the person who actually purchases the product. Mom comes along, and throws a few tubes of Aquafresh in the cart, takes them to the checkout, and buys them. In one sense, Mom is the customer. However, who is the end user, or consumer? Now the Aquafresh makes its way to the master bathroom, where Mom and Dad use it dutifully every morning. Another tube goes to the family bathroom, where the kids use it as well. And yet another tube goes to the guest bathroom, where it is only used occasionally. Mom is the customer, but so are the others: Dad, the kids, the guests, etc. One might call them residual customers, because although they didn’t actually make the purchase, they are using it and they are benefiting from it.
So, in a spiritual sense, who is the customer in our churches? I believe the customer is the one who benefits. Let me be clear, we’re not hawking a product here. We’re sharing good news with people that can lead to a life-changing relationship with Jesus Christ. If ‘good news’ is our ‘product,’ then, who benefits from us sharing it? God? One could say that our worship pleases God, but God is unchanging. God does not benefit from our worship of Him. He is, was, and is to come, regardless of what we do. Who benefits? I believe the people in the pews benefit from coming to church, praising God, hearing the Word, and being spiritually uplifted, challenged, encouraged, etc. They are, in that sense, ‘the customer.’ Who else? Those outside of the church who benefit because people in the church are sharing the love and mission of Christ. These are the residual customers; the end users. The husband who may not come to church regularly, but is blessed with a godly wife who influences him and the children. We may not see the results immediately, but there are residual benefits that are passed on to people outside of the church. I realize there are people who are thinking – IT’S NOT ABOUT WHO BENEFITS! IT’S NOT ABOUT WHAT’S IN IT FOR ME, WHAT I GAIN, ETC.! But isn’t it? I realize we are in worship for what we can give, and what we can offer to God in our praise and worship and submission of ourselves to Him. But the Bible is full of examples of Jesus teaching that coming to God results in benefits for those who come. Rest for the weary. Peace for the troubled. Eternal life for the lost. Relationship for the disconnected. Hope for the hurting. Jesus came to seek and to save the lost. If that isn’t a benefit, I don’t know what is. Sunday mornings, I come to give and offer what I have and who I am to God. But God gives me abundantly more than I could ever give to Him. I forget who said it, Spurgeon perhaps: “I am simply a beggar who is telling other beggars where to find bread.” I’m not going to send them there and say, “but don’t expect to get anything for yourself out of this! There’s bread there in abundance, but it’s not for you!” Of course it’s for us, that’s why God sent Jesus into the world.

14 comments:

Brett Probert said...

You go boy!

Chris said...

Somewhere out there, perhaps in Jefferson Hills, there comes the sound of "Quest for Quality" book being ripped in two.

Jeff Kahl said...

Great post, Jeffrey! I think it was Calvin who said, "To know Christ is to know His benefits." Or maybe it was Hobbes...?

But seriously, I agree. While worship obviously is giving glory and praise to the One True God, the reason for CORPORATE worship is also for brothers and sisters in Christ to be encouraged with the good news and be equipped to live out their faith in the world. So the congregation SHOULD benefit from the worship experience.

Keith H. McIlwain said...

Aside from being uncomfortable with the capitalist metaphors, let me offer a challenge & rebuttal. If the customer is the one who is ultimately being served, then certainly God is the customer.

Let me go a step further...God is also the One who is serving. If we are blessed enough to be tools used in service - registers and tags in Wal-Mart, forks and knives at Denny's, etc. - then, hallelujah!

Now, this doesn't mean that others don't "benefit". If I am a customer and I purchase milk, then my family also benefits when I get home and Claire makes herself hot cocoa.

So, there are a lot of ways to extend the metaphor. I think, however, that much contemporary theology - both evangelical and liberal - has been distorted by the notion that people are the customers. Thus, we end up with well meaning aberrations such as "Quest for Quality".

On the right, you get a lot (but not all) of contemporary worship which tries to be primarily "seeker sensitive" and evangelistic rather than Christocentric and formative of disciples. So, "meeting their needs" becomes the end game, rather than meeting God's demands. That's not bad or wrong...but is it still worship?

On the left, you end up with a theology of adjectives, as you try to be just, inclusive, and tolerant; it's not bad and it's not wrong - it's just not the gospel.

The gospel, as I understand it, isn't primarily about people and meeting their needs, although that may happen. It's also not about adjectives, which are good and can be useful tools. The gospel is a person - Jesus Christ - and shifting the focus elsewhere can be a slippery slope. I know we agree here, and I'm not trying to preach or convert you. But, you did go to Penn State, so maybe I need to clarify.

At any rate, I hope you can see my point and my concerns with this type of language. We've forgotten in the UMC, I think, that theological language ought to be precise, and that it matters. And we're paying for our memory failures in many ways.

Jeff Kahl said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Jeff Kahl said...

Keith,

I hear what you're saying, and you make some valid points. I just don't understand why you're so down on capitalist metaphors. I mean, Vanderhoff's article isn't proposing any kind of syncretistic mix here...it's just using a cultural reality as a means of communicating the gospel.

We're all taught in seminary that we must, to some extent, contextualize the gospel message in the cultural realities where we serve. If Paul could utilize the idolatrous, pagan imagery of "An Unknown God" in Athens as a vehicle for proclaiming Christ, why can we not utilize the capitalist imagery in which we find ourselves for the same purpose?

Capitalism is no worse than any other human social/economic system. If Gustavo Gutierrez, James Cone and Walter Brueggemann can use Marxist rhetoric in their theologies, I don't see why it's off limits for American pastors to use some capitalist rhetoric to the same ends.

Cheers...............
Jeff

Keith H. McIlwain said...

Jeff, I have no doubt that capitalism is the best economic system we've come up with, but it is still fatally flawed and contains within its very philosphical foundations a good amount of idolatry and greed. Other systems are worse...Marxism is nothing short of demonic. But I'm always uncomfortable when we try to lift up one secular economic or political system as some kind of Biblical norm...whether it's the Right lifting up capitalism and democracy or the Left lifting up Marxism and socialism. Hard to find any of that in Scripture.

I hope I didn't imply that Jeff V is doing this; I understand that he was simply using a metaphor. That's fine. But the language itself makes me uncomfortable, just as business language re: Church growth makes me squirm.

Jeff Vanderhoff said...

Keith,
I do see your point, and respect your position (although I have NO respect for you, personally) Alright, just kidding. Anyway, I don't see God as the customer in the way you do. I see God more as the owner. When I think of 'customer' and the metaphor of capitalism, I am seeing the customer as the one who benefits, ie., the one who has a need to be met. I don't believe God has any needs to be met, but I do believe that He is the source for providing for our needs. Taken to the extreme (as some opponents of this metaphor do), of course it's not about our needs - "God, I'd really like a bigger boat, or a pew closer to the back, or couldn't they turn the heat up in this place..." those are not the types of needs I'm talking about. I'm talking about our need for a relationship with Christ, our need to be challenged, fulfilled, encouraged, convicted, driven, forgiven, healed, etc. I believe all of those needs are met in Christ and through Christ, and the church is an agent God uses to bridge the world and Christ. So, I do what I can to create an environment in the church and in worship where people can come with expectation (in the right spirit) and experience God in worship. In that, I believe there is an opportunity for certain needs to be met. I believe that worship CAN be Christocentric, formative of disciples, AND seeker-sensitive and evangelistic. I don't see the dichotomy in what we do. Sure, it can be taken to the extreme on either side, and given a choice, I too would lean towards Christocentric worship rather than seeker-sensitive. However, I don't think they have to be polar opposites. We can show people through worship how focusing on Christ and deepening our relationship with Him can have an incredibly powerful and positive impact on other aspect of our own lives and our own needs. Sorry to make you squirm! But I'm comfortable with the analogy, with the proper foundation.
Jeff K - Thanks for understanding my point!

Brett Probert said...

I'm working on a new book entitled "Quest for Socialist Mediocrity" I'll be offering seminars soon...Jeff, do you want me to lead a session for "the probationers" (don't you just love that phrase? It makes us sound oh, so superior!)

Jeff Vanderhoff said...

Brett - as long as you play guitar for everyone along with the training seminar. Blues music. Like to hear it? Here it go! "I've got the probationary blues! Led by trainers without clues! Three years of meetings and retreats! I'll forget it all within 2 weeks! Yeah, I've got the probationary blues! Da-Da!"

Anonymous said...

Jeff, I'm sure it was an oversight and I am not yet privy (I intend to go back and read it now) to the previous conversation, but where in the discussion is obedience? I worship because God demands/commands it. Personal benefits there may be, but in my reading of scripture they are by no means intrinsic in the act. I am also uncertain of the claim that God is unmoved by worship (or unchanged as it was said).

Jeff Vanderhoff said...

Andrew,
There is certainly much more to worship than just what I have written here. Obedience is definitely a part of it that I did not touch on, although you are correct that it is a command that we are to obey. Thanks for adding it to the discussion. Regarding whether or not our worship changes God, I'm going from Malachi 3:6 "I, the LORD, do not change." Also, my overall conception of God is that He is unchanging, and not dependent on His creation for adding or taking away from His glory and majesty. "I am that I am." One of my professors used to interpret "Yahweh" as meaning, "I am He who is." I always liked that interpretation, and with it, the idea that God "is" regardless of what we do.

smkyqtzxtl said...

Amen

Brett Probert said...

C'mon Magi....muse afresh!